趙承熙與楊致遠

曾幾何時,Yahoo!的楊致遠是Geek界的人氣偶像,更是互聯網時代的American Dream。據說他10歲時跟隨母親到美國,懂得英語的只得一個Shoe字,不過他在26歲時已經創辦了Yahoo!,28歲時他已經是億萬富豪。無端端 講楊致遠,是因為在電視上看到了喪心病狂的趙承熙,怨恨富人的歇斯底里說話,也見到評論員沒頭沒腦地大講種族歧視,說三道四甚麼美國社會的暴力現象,思哲 作為留美的過來人,實在不得不為美國的可愛說點話。

趙承熙也好,楊致遠也好,都是歷史中的偶然,將他們塑造成社會現象的典範,不但膚淺,更是愚昧不堪。可 惜,這種Generalization偏偏是自以為持平公道的傳媒人,及所謂Public Intellects最愛用的手法,思哲是個俗人,只知道這叫以偏概全。

事實上,若要說趙承熙和楊致遠有些甚麼共通處,那只有一點,就是他們的上一代,在 老家都不是生活得特別富足,偶然的情況下選擇了移民到美國。可以肯定的是,美國都給予了他們充份的機遇,楊致遠創辦了Yahoo!,趙承熙的親姐在普林斯 頓畢業之後成為了國務院的供應商,不過趙承熙非但看不見這些無限的可能性,更加說自己被迫至無路可逃。悲劇,永遠都只有主角一人自己承受;不過,努力和創 意卻可以為其他人造就機會,這就是美國精神。

對「趙承熙與楊致遠」的一則回應

  1. 我同意你的觀點. 我都是留美過來人. 其實美國人十分單純, 亦待人很好.

    我只覺得有時候, 是否父母太過保護下一代, 令他們失去競爭力, 不能承受一下偶然的挫折? 是否物質太豐足, 令我們太多時間去胡思亂想?

  2. 對,美國是一個提供「American Dream」的地方,但並無說明這會是一個 sweet dream 定係 bad dream。

    一切,仍都是靠自己。

  3. 這種崇高的精神我在香港,巴西, 法國, 日本, 中國, 印度 也有見過. 所以這大概是人類的精神. 總不能說它是美國的精神吧.
    所以, 在地球上的各位也要努力啊.

  4. 那自閉症跟精神病的問題呢?
    而且,閣下看不見種族歧視的情況及暴力現象並不代表它們不存在(或少數)呢。

  5. To ricup,

    There are people who always blame everything, including their failure, onto others.

    I did not claim that discrimination does not exist. But so what? People discriminate against others, actually by making themselves at disadvantage. Gary Becker talked about that and I try not to repeat the findings there. My point is: being discriminated by some people is not a reason for one to go mad – and definitely not an excuse for the pretentious to ask for all sorts of funny things, say legislation.

    I do not disregard the fact that Cho has mood disorder – but saying that someone has mood disorder so to justify act of killing is simply another form of discrimination against other less-fortunate people who are also suffering from mood disorder.

  6. Agree with 留學生 too~ I just doubt the so called “American Dream" and it’s kinda another way of generalization.

    (P.S. I am not seeking justification of murdering)

  7. American Dream is not a generalization. It is an ideal.

    Yes, it is an ideal. Some people work towards it, some people don’t. That’s a matter of choice – but that is also the essense of the founding of America, freedom. Hope it makes thing clearer.

    Of course there are other places where people can find opportunity, I do not disagree with it. Whenever there are free minds, there are opportunities.

    But there are even more people who mistaken the situation in US and have a strong bias against this country, especially the notion of freedom.

    Whatever tragedy takes place, commentary blames the American Culture, blame freedom, blame the republicans etc.

    Let me recommend a book for those who want to understand this kind of mentality: What’s Left by Nick Cohen. Cohen, brought up in Manchester, a traditional union town, discusses how the left ideology deteriorate into populistic anti-americanism and contradicts itself.

    Even in HK, there are people who have a dislike of America but doesn’t know why. Some people dislike the image projected since Reagan’s era – but forget the benefits as a result of the ending of cold war. Perhaps mainland government had done too much patriotic education? I don’t know.

迴響已關閉。

在 WordPress.com 建立網站或網誌

向上 ↑

%d 位部落客按了讚: